The query represents a real question
We check suggested queries and meaningful variants instead of inventing long phrases from product features.
EDITORIAL SYSTEM
AI provides speed; primary evidence and counterexample gates provide control. This is how ToolCriteria selects, updates and sometimes merges research.
BEFORE PUBLISHING
A candidate that fails a gate is held or rejected before scoring. Avoiding the wrong article matters more than increasing article count.
We check suggested queries and meaningful variants instead of inventing long phrases from product features.
We inspect whether current results leave a comparison, source or decision gap that this article can fill.
Incompatible goals become separate pages; an intent already covered by an article is merged instead of duplicated.
A consequential claim needs primary or public evidence. Missing evidence is shown as uncertainty, not filled by guesswork.
The article must help a reader compare, test, configure, start, stop or update something without distorting the query.
We preserve why a candidate was accepted, held or rejected so AI does not repeatedly propose the same weak idea.
AFTER PUBLISHING
Verify canonical, hreflang, sitemap and internal links.
Review indexing, early queries and search snippets.
Add decision material where impressions and intent show a gap.
Reassess the conclusion after price, feature or term changes.
CONTENT PORTFOLIO
Procedures, settings, prices and terms: answer a concrete question and connect it to a decision.
Choices, alternatives and thresholds that cannot be resolved from a search snippet alone.
Combine distributed primary sources into a process, checklist or model.
Track price, term and program changes and show who is affected from which date.
AI & QUALITY CONTROL
The scope of AI assistance and the conditions that stop publication are public.
Read the editorial & AI policy ↗